Data protection by design, GDPR, privacy

Combating child exploitation with ethically designed technology

Government services throughout the UK gather more data than the various agencies can process, leaving them wondering who might be slipping through the cracks from the lack of ability to analyse it. When safeguarding children disconnects in the data kept by various agencies can mean lost opportunity to identify victims, to mitigate risks earlier, to save a young life.

Project CESIUM, funded by Innovate UK, brings together Linconshire Police, National Working Group, and Trilateral Research to advance risk assessment practices by applying machine learning to analyse this big data to prevent and combat child exploitation.

The aim is to innovate techniques to get a more complete and socially equitable picture, pointing to potential future harm while not subjecting any child or family to unnecessary intervention or possible social stigma.

The Ethical challenge

Algorithmic decisions can create power struggles, like political debates over who gets to define indicators around vulnerability, need, and neglect. They bring fears of such tools displacing professional decision-making.

Various critiques of predictive policing have already identified possible deficiencies in the deployment of these new technologies . For example, algorithms that extrapolate historical trends into the future show bias and discrimination. Related critiques emerge when correlating an area’s potential to be crime-ridden based on past police responses rather than actual crime, making forecasts about violence that unintentionally turn geography into a proxy for race, or applying causal factors from online to face-to-face interactions.

Transparency and new methods to assess accuracy can help, but they alone do not create fairness in data analytics.

CESIUM response: develop technologies that promote ethical decisions and trusted government actions

The Project CESIUM’s team is taking these ethical tensions as its starting point and work in developing ethically designed algorithms.

Armed with ethical impact assessment methods that support ethics-by-design, CESIUM aims to design machine learning that can create insights from the diverse risk assessment practices and data bridge between each piece of the scattered child exploitation vulnerability puzzle.  More readily, make it possible for Linconshire Police to identify and assess the underlying risk factors that shape such exploitation.

By starting design of the analytics from the ethical tensions, CESIUM takes a step back from asking ‘what data is available to be used’, ‘what data should be gathered’, or even ‘what data is best’.

CESIUM’s interdisciplinary team – made of social scientist, legal expert and data scientists who work across the socio-technology divide – starts with questions around ethical impact:

  • What are acceptable results of a tools use?
  • What ought better mitigation of child exploitation look like?
  • Who is responsible for such use and decisions?
  • To whom are designer and users accountable?
  • What is needed to maintain the integrity of the police using the algorithm?
  • What is needed to gain and maintain the trust of those whose data is collected?
  • How can the data, the algorithms, and the use of the outputs be used to preserve a child’s dignity?
  • How do these tools help balance personal data protection and individual freedom with community justice?

Framing data analytic design within these questions and units of ethical analysis along with the units of data analysis can act as a form of societal accountability, building into the tools from the start novel forms of responsibility and integrating societal concerns into the kinds of practices and outcomes that are enabled.

It invites scrutiny into types of data used, methodological approaches, value of results in various contexts of use to really understand the ethical implications of various algorithmic options for bringing together more than just information, but also the different conceptions of vulnerability, care, and responsibility encoded in that data.

By really digging into the question of what can be made better by predictive algorithms, what services changes can arise, which populations or communities benefit, CESIUM can better assess what tools ought to do and can do to improve both government services and community outcomes.

For more information about the project visit the Project CESIUM webpage and contact communications@trilateralresearch.com

To receive updates about the Project CESIUM join the project’s mailing here: https://www.trilateralresearch.com/join-cesium/

For more insights on this research area please contact our team:

Katrina Petersen, Associate Research Manager at Trilateral Research

Katrina Petersen TRI
Tags:


‘Risk Assessment Report and Methodology’

You can view the Executive Summary and Table of contents of the Project Solebay Risk Assessment Methodology Report.

Please sign up to the Solebay mailing list to download the Full Solebay project report.